The Journal of Daesoon Academy of Sciences
The Daesoon Academy of Sciences
Article

상생 윤리의 체계에 관한 소고

김학택1,
Hak-Taek Kim1,
1한국, 대진대학교
Corresponding Author : Kim, Hak-Taek

ⓒ Copyright 2009, The Daesoon Academy of Sciences. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Published Online: Jun 30, 2005

Abstract

In spite of the ethics of sangsaeng is based on Daesoon thoughts, we can regard it as a moral theory independent on religion. Like other reasonable moral theories, It has three levels, moral standard, moral rules and moral acts or judgements. Sangsaeng is moral standard in the ethics of sangsaeng. moral rules are derived from it and could justify many particular moral judgements and acts. The ethics of sangsaeng belongs to metaphysical ethics and holistic ethics because it is derived holistic, sangsaeng’s world view of Daesoon thoughts.

The ethics of sangsaeng, first of all, extends the realm of moral community to all beings of world. Therefore it might works well on as a solution for environmental problem recently issued. Secondly, because beings are fundamentally all equal in holistic world, the principle of equality is basic principle in the ethics of sangsaeng. Finally, in relation to the principle of equality, the ethics of sangsaeng needs ‘Haewon’ as the first moral rule because it is a practical method for solution to various social inequality - racism, sexism, regionalism and so on.

Keywords: 상생 윤리; 대순사상; 도덕규준; 전체적 세계관; 윤리공동체; 평등의 원칙; 해원
Keywords: The ethics of sangsaeng; Daesoon thoughts; Moral standard; Holistic world view; Moral community; The principle of equality; Haewon

<참고문헌>

1.

『전경』, 대순진리회 교무부, 서울: 대순진리회 출판부, 1974..

2.

『대순지침』, 대순진리회 교무부, 서울: 대순진리회 출판부, 1984..

3.

고창택, 『생명사상의 환경윤리학』, 『국제 중국철학회 제10차 서울국제학술회의 발표자료집』, 국제중국철학회, 1997..

4.

김용정, 『양자론과 주역에서의 전일론적 세계관』, 『과학과 철학』, 서울: 범양사, 1996..

5.

김유신, 『전체론에 대한 과학철학적 입장』, 『과학사상』 23호, 서울: 범양사, 1997..

6.

김태길, 『윤리학』, 서울: 박영사, 1998..

7.

김학택, 『무자기와 자아실현』, 『대순사상논총』 13집, 경기도: 대순사상학술원, 2001..

8.

김학택, 『환경과 윤리적 공동체』, 서울: 민족문화문고, 2003..

9.

김형효, 『동서철학에 대한 주체적 기록』, 서울: 고려원, 1985..

10.

노길명, 『한국사회와 종교운동』, 서울: 빅벨출판사, 1988..

11.

박이문, 『자비의 윤리학』, 서울: 철학과 현실사, 1990..

12.

소흥렬, 『윤리와 사고』, 서울: 이대출판부, 1989..

13.

윤재근, 『음양합덕 一試論』, 『대순사상논총』 2집, 1997..

14.

윤재근, 『대순사상과 생태적 환경보존의 문제』, 『종교연구』 제23집, 경기도: 한국종교학회 2001..

15.

최동희, 『해원상생의 새로운 이해』, 『대순사상논총』 제4집, 경기도: 대순사상학술원, 1988..

16.

Benjamin, M., Ethics and Animal Consciousness, Social Ethics; Morality and Social Policy, New York: McGraw-Hall, Inc., 1987..

17.

Harris, Jr. C. E, Applying Moral Theories, California: Wadsworth Publishing Co., 1986..

18.

Kant, I., Lectures on Ethics, trans, L. Infield, Methuen & Co. LTD, 1979..

19.

Mackinnon, B., Ethics; Theory and Contemporary Issues, California: Wadsworth Publishing Co., 1995..

20.

Mill, J. S., Utilitarianism, New York; Liberal Arts Press, 1957..

21.

Moore, G. E., Principia Ethica, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1956..

22.

Niebuhr, R., Moral Man and Immoral Society, Charles Scribner’s sons, New York, 1960..

23.

Singer, P., Practical Ethics, London; Cambridge Univ. Press, 1980..

24.

Smart. N., 『현대 종교학』, Worldviews; Crosscultural Explorations of Human Belief s, 강돈구 역, 서울: 청년사, 1986..

25.

Taylor. P., The Respect of Nature: A Theory of Environmental Ethics, Princeton, N.J., Princeton Univ. Press, 1986..