The Journal of Daesoon Academy of Sciences
The Daesoon Academy of Sciences
Article

박은식의 국교론을 통해 본 대순사상의 민족주의적 특징: 천지공사와 지상선인에서 나타난 개인의 주체성을 중심으로

김현우1,
Hyon-Woo Kim1,
1성균관대학교 유교문화연구소ㆍ연구원
1Sungkyunkwan University
Corresponding Author : Hyon-Woo Kim

ⓒ Copyright 2014, The Daesoon Academy of Sciences. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Aug 31, 2013 ; Accepted: Mar 09, 2014

Published Online: Jun 01, 2017

ABSTRACT

There are many modern elements in religions appeared in the early Korean modern era. From the nationalism perspective, most religions had tendencies toward anti-feudalism and anti-foreign power. Pak Eun Sik(朴殷植) emphasized the importance to explain those religions as the National Religion in his writing ≪Korea Painful History(韓國痛史)≫. That is, he realized those as one of Korean spirits or souls keeping Korean identities like the Jew's Judaism or the Turk's Islam. In the paper, I try to analyze religions on Kang Jeung San(姜甑山) with Daesoonjinri-hoe as the central figure from Pak's perspective.

In the early Korean modern era when Kang went his own the Savior way, Korea and its society got into uncontrollable confusion because of strong demands both of a feudal-state breaking and against pillaging foreign-power especially Japan. For all countries of the world, it is difficult to change from a feudal state into the modern nation state to keep existing society order. Because the reformation under old social systems means the incomplete reformation. So in this era new religions showed the neglected class of people the vision of new society.

Meanwhile Korean society try to become a modern state, and now became a recognized modern state in international society. But it is still insufficient to debate on groups and their roles for Korea modernity in that time especially new religions. Since Korea independence, new religions including Daesoonjinrihoe have not receive good reviews because of a certain religion group expansion and the government's regulation and control toward new religions. Till today, I think, Independence Movement as well as reform of modern awareness have not relatively receive reasonable reviews. So I hope to serve as a momentum that in early Korea modern era new religions receive reasonable and positive reviews.

Keywords: Daesoon thoughts; Chungsan Kang; nationalism; Korea new religion; Pak Eun Sik; national religion

참고문헌(References)

1.

대순진리회 교무부, 『전경』, 여주: 대순진리회 출판부, 2010.

2.

김현우, 「양계초와 박은식의 신민설과 대동사상에 관한 연구」, 성균관대학교 박사학위 논문, 2012.

3.

노관범, 「대한제국기 박은식과 장지연의 자강사상 연구」, 서울대학교 박사학위 논문, 2007.

4.

막스 베버, 『프로테스탄티즘의 윤리와 자본주의 정신』, 박성수 역, 서울: 문예출판사, 2004.

5.

박은식, 『백암박은식전서』, 동방미디어, 2002.

6.

박정심, 「박은식의 사상적 전환에 대한 고찰」, 『한국사상사학』 12, 1999.

7.

박정심, , 「백암 박은식의 철학사상에 관한 연구」, 성균관대학교 박사학위 논문, 2001.

8.

신용하, 『박은식의 사회사상 연구』, 서울: 서울대학교 출판부, 1982.

9.

신용하, 『한말 애국계몽운동의 사회사』, 서울: 나남출판사, 2004.

10.

윤병희, 「백암 박은식의 역사의식:『한국통사』와 『한국독립운동지혈사』를 중심으로」, 『한국사학논총:수촌 박영석교수 화갑기념』, 탐구당, 1992.

11.

이경원, 『한국 신종교와 대순사상』, 서울: 문사철, 2011.

12.

이경원, 『대순종학원론』, 서울: 문사철, 2013.

13.

정대진, 「해원상생의 이해」, 『대순사상논총』 4, 1998.

14.

최영진, 『유교사상의 본질과 현재성』, 서울: 성균관대학교 출판부, 2002.

15.

《대한자강회월보》, 한국사데이터베이스, http://db.history.go.kr.

16.

《동아일보》, 한국언론진흥재단, http://www.kinds.or.kr.

17.

《서북학회월보》, 한국사데이터베이스, http://db.history.go.kr.

18.

《서우》, 한국사데이터베이스, http://db.history.go.kr.