The Journal of Daesoon Academy of Sciences

The Daesoon Academy of Sciences

J. Daesoon Acad. Sci. 2014; 23:153-192

pISSN: 1598-3439

DOI: https://doi.org/10.25050/jdaos.2014.23.0.153

Article

심의민주주의에 대한 해원상생사상의 정치철학적 함의

정병화¹^,^†

The Political Implication of ‘Haewonsangsaeng’ on Deliberative Democracy

Byung-Hwa Chung¹^,^†

¹대진대학교ㆍ교수

¹Daejin University

^†Corresponding Author : Byung-Hwa Chung

ⓒ Copyright 2014, The Daesoon Academy of Sciences. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: May 31, 2014 ; Accepted: Jul 27, 2014

Published Online: Jun 01, 2017

ABSTRACT

This article’s purpose is to overcome the inadequacy of deliberative democracy for communication on the basis of Haewonsangsaeng. The inadequacy of deliberative democracy for communication is presented as the following two. First, as deliberative democracy treats civic virtue as instrumental thing, deliberative democracy is still in moral solipsism. Second, as deliberative democracy doesn’t consider ‘the inequality of power’ among diverse political positions, the project of deliberative democracy for communication ends up in the exposure of the inequality of power among diverse political positions.

Sangsaeng in Haewonsangsaeng concerned with inter-relationship over individualism treats civic virtue as original motility. In this context, Sangsaeng in Haewonsangsaeng is the alternative notion to overcome the first inadequacy of deliberative democracy for communication. Haewon in Haewonsangsaengas is the condition for Sangsaeng. and Haewon’s method is to exclude or to eliminate the structural frame of Sanggeuk meaning mutual conflict and antagonism. This article presents two structural frame of Sanggeuk. First, First structural obstacle as internal obstacle is suggested through analyzing pluralism on the basis of existential philosophy. The result of the analysis is the ‘antagonism’ between the hegemonical value and the peripheral value. Second structural obstacle as external obstacle is the extinction of public sphere caused by the growth of market and the expansion of bureaucracy.

Keywords: Haewonsangsaeng; Sangsaeng; Sanggeuk; Haewon; Deliberative Democracy

참고문헌(References)

대순진리회 교무부, 전경 , 서울: 대순진리회출판부, 1989.

대순진리회 교무부, 대순진리회 요람 , 서울: 대순진리회 출판부, 1969.

고남식, 「전경에 나타난 원의 양상과 해원」, 대순사상논총 4, 1998.

라클라우ㆍ무폐, 사회변혁과 헤게모니 , 김성기 옮김, 서울: 터, 1990.

마르쿠제, 일차원적 인간 , 차인석 옮김, 서울: 삼성출판사, 1982.

마이클 샌델, 돈으로 살수 없는 것들: 무엇이 가치를 결정하는가 , 안기순 옮김, 서울: 외이즈베리, 2012.

맥킨타이어, 덕의 상실 , 이진우 옮김, 서울: 문예, 1997.

유재갑, 「대순사상의 '인존'과 '상생'-그 현대적 의의」, 대순진리학술논총 1, 2007.

이경원, 「대순진리회의 '상생'이념에 관한 연구」, 신종교연구 13, 2005.

10.

이낙의, 한자정해 3, 서울: 비봉출판사, 1994.

11.

이항녕, 「해원상생의 현대적 의의」, 대순사상논총 4, 1998.

12.

주현철, 「冤의 본질적 의미에 관한 연구」, 대순사상논총 4, 1998.

13.

지마, 이데올로기와 이론 , 허창운 옮김, 서울: 문학과 지성사, 1996.

14.

찰스 테일러, 불안한 현대사회 , 송영배 옮김, 서울: 이학사, 2001.

15.

최영진, 「역학사상의 철학적 탐구」, 성균관대학교 박사학위 논문, 1989.

16.

칸트, 윤리형이상학 정초 , 백종현 옮김, 서울: 아카넷, 2005.

17.

하버마스, 현대성의 철학적 담론 , 이진우 옮김, 서울: 문예출판사, 2002.

18.

하이데거, 존재와 시간 , 전양범 옮김, 서울: 시간과 공간사, 1995.

19.

헤겔, 정신현상학 2, 임석진 옮김, 파주: 한길사, 2005.

20.

호네쓰, 정의의 타자 , 문성훈 옮김, 서울: 나남, 2009.

21.

호크하이머, 아드르노, 계몽의 변증법 , 김유동 옮김, 서울: 문학과 지성사, 2002.

22.

D. Hume, Enquries concerning Human Understanding and concerning the Principles of Morals, London: Oxford UP, 1975.

23.

D. Hume, A Treatise of Human Nature, Oxford: Oxford UP, 1978.

24.

F. D. Waal, "Appendix B: Do Apes Have a Thoery of Mind", in Primate and Philosophy: How Morality Evolved, Princeton: Princeton UP, 2006.

25.

F. D. Waal, "Morally Evolved-Primate Social Instinct, Human Morality and the Rise and Fall of 'Veneer Theory'", in Primate and Philosopher: How Morality Evolved, Princeton: Princeton UP, 2006.

26.

G. H. Mead, Mind, Self and Society, Chicago: Chicago UP, 1934.

27.

I. M. Young, "Activist Challenges to Deliberative Democracy", in Debating Deliberative Democracy, Oxford: Blackwell, 2003.

28.

J. Habermas, Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, Cambridge: MIT Press, 1996.

29.

J. Habermas, The Inclusion of The Other, Cambridge: MIT Press, 1998.

30.

J. J. Rousseau, Social Contract And The First and Second Discourse, New York: Vail-Ballou, 2002.

31.

J. Needham, Science and Civilization in China 2, London: Cambridge UP, 1961.

32.

J. P. Sartre, Being and Nothing, New York: Philosophical Library, 1956.

33.

J. Rawls, A Theory of Justice, Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1971.

34.

L. T. Hobhouse, Liberalism, London: Oxford UP, 1945.

35.

L. T. Wittgenstein, On Certainty, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1969.

36.

M. Buber, I and Thou, New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1937.

37.

M. Foucault, Power/Knowledge, Selected Interview and Other Writings 1972-1977, Brighton: Harvester Press, 1980.

38.

M. Merleau-Ponty, The Phenomenology of Perception, London: Routledge, 1962.

39.

M. Merleau-Ponty, The Primacy of Perception, Evanston: Northwestern UP, 1964.

40.

M. Merleau-Ponty, "Hegel's existentialism", in Sense and Non-Sense, Evanston: Northwestern UP, 1964.

41.

M. Merleau-Ponty, "Metaphysics and the Novel", in Sense and Non-Sense, Evanston: Northwestern UP, 1964.

42.

R. Dworkin, "Objectivity and Truth: You'd Better Beleive it" Philosophy and Public Affairs 25:2, 1996.

43.

S. Benhabib, Democracy and Difference: Contesting the boundaries of the political, New York: Princeton University Press, 1996.

44.

S. Benhabib, "Toward a Deliberative Model of Democratic Legitimacy", in Democracy and Difference, Princeton: Princeton UP, 1996.

45.

T. Hobbes, Leviathan, Oxford: Oxford UP, 2012.