The Journal of Daesoon Academy of Sciences
The Daesoon Academy of Sciences
Article

후천세계가 지향하는 인간상 탐구: 정역의 지인(至人) 중심으로

박혜순1,
Hye-Soon Park1,
1서강대학교ㆍ강사
1Sogang University
Corresponding Author : Hye-Soon, Park

ⓒ Copyright 2015, The Daesoon Academy of Sciences. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: May 31, 2015 ; Accepted: Oct 06, 2015

Published Online: Jun 01, 2017

ABSTRACT

The theory of post-heaven provided Korea’s many emerging national religions with spiritual ground. The I Ching originated in China emphasizes the principles of change or static aspects of world, while Right I Ching, which Il-Bu Kim suggested, underlines dynamic aspects of world. Il-Bu Kim is perceived to open a new stage in the history of philosophy of I Ching in this regard. His most remarkable contribution is the view of Great Opening Era of Post-Heaven, according to which the clock of cosmos shows the era of great change from Pre-Heaven to Post-Heaven and in the world of Post-Heaven everything will take its proper place. As to human society, Il-Bu Kim foresaw the change from disharmony to harmony, imbalance to balance and era of xiaoren to that of junzi. The advent of such a new world, however, asks human’s moral revolution as a prerequisite.

In the tradition of East Asian thought, human is the center of the Samjae, Heaven-Earth-Human and the only being which could participate in the growth of Heaven and Earth. Without the change of human mind, however, human can neither participate in the growth of Heaven and Earth nor expect the right change of Heaven and Earth. Even though the world of nature changes according to the principle of cosmic harmony, as the Right I Ching predicts, the real change of Heaven and Earth can be achieved only with moral change of human. The human in the Right I Ching is a free man who sticks to nothing and communicates with cosmos with empty mind. This is the very image of perfect man(至人). The perfect man in the Right I Ching is the main agent of everything, that’s to say, the main agent of the great opening to Post-Heaven Era. This is the reason why most leaders of Koran emerging religions concentrate on the change of human.

In this regard, Jeung-San Kang encouraged people to become the perfect man through the purification of mind and body and the great opening of inner man, depending on the metaphysical principle of the Right I Ching. Cheok and Resolution of grievances for the mutual beneficence of all life are what he suggested as a method of the great opening of inner man. Such a view is based on the thought that the accumulated sinful behaviors are obstacles to cosmic change and the time of mutual beneficience opens with the removal of the obstacles. If such religious practices are so effective, as Jeung-San Kang says, that future world could consist of perfect men who have achived the great opening of inner man, moral change, and change of consciousness, we could expect that the activities of xiaoren will be shrinked and junzi will be welcomed, as the Right I Ching predicts.

Keywords: Right I Ching(正易); Pre-Heaven(先天); Post-Heaven(後天); Perfect man(至人); Cheok(慼); Resolution of grievances for the mutual beneficence of all life(解冤相生)

참고문헌(References)

1.

『論語』.

2.

『尙書』.

3.

『莊子今註今譯』, 陳鼓應, 北京中華書局, 2001.

4.

『莊子』.

5.

『正易』.

6.

『周易』.

7.

『太平經』.

8.

『전경』, 서울: 대순진리회 교무부, 1989.

9.

『대순지침』, 서울: 대순진리회 교무부, 1984.

10.

소강절, 『황극경세서』, 노영균 옮김, 서울: 대원출판사, 2002.

11.

카렌 호나이, 『내가 나를 치유한다』, 서상복 옮김, 서울: 연암서가, 2015.

12.

Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, 『샤르댕전집Ⅰ 인간의 현상』, 이효상 역, 서울: 삼성출판사, 1971.

13.

요명춘, 강학위, 양위현, 『주역철학사』, 심경호 옮김, 서울: 예문서원, 1994.

14.

이정호, 『정역연구』, 서울: 국제대학 인문사회과학연구소, 1976.

15.

이정호, 『원문대조 국역주해 정역』, 서울: 아세아문화사, 1990.

16.

이정호, 『제삼의 역학』, 서울: 아세아문화사, 1992.

17.

최진석, 『인간이 그리는 무늬』, 서울: 소나무, 2013.

18.

김석한, 「대순사상에 나타난 인간주체에 관한 연구」, 『신종교연구』 5, 2001.

19.

김용환, 「정역의 후천 개벽윤리」, 『윤리연구』 79, 2010.

20.

양재학, 「정역사상의 현대적 이해」, 『동서철학연구』 24, 2002.

21.

이경원,「한국 근대 신종교에 나타난 선ㆍ후천론의 특질: 대순신앙을 중심으로」, 『신종교연구』 4, 2001.

22.

이경원, 「대순사상의 인간관 연구-인존론을 중심으로」, 『신종교연구』 12, 2005.

23.

이경원, 「강증산의 후천개벽론」, 『한국종교』 35, 2012.

24.

이정호, 「정역의 출현과 그 인간혁명에 대하여」, 『한국학보』 3(2), 1977.

25.

이정호, 『정역과 일부』, 서울: 아세아문화사, 1994.

26.

이현중, 「『정역』의 한국 사상사적 위상」, 『범한철학』 20, 1999.

27.

이현중, 「역수원리를 통해본 선진 유학의 소인과 군자」, 『한문학논집』 27, 2008.

28.

임병학, 「한국 신종교에 있어서 후천개벽과 역(易)의 상관성」, 『원불교사상과 종교문화』 55, 2013.

29.

정형욱, 「음양오행론과 정역에서 보는 개벽사상과 지구생태위기」, 『환경철학』 17, 2014.

30.

Chi-Tim Lai, "The Daoist Concept of Central Harmony in the Scripture of Great Peace: Human Responsibility for the Maladies of Nature", Daoism and ecology: ways within a cosmic landscape, edited by N.J. Girardot, James Miller, and Liu Xiaogan. Cambridge, Mass: Center for the Study of World Religions, Harvard Divinity School, 2001.