Article

대순사상의 역학적 조명: 종지(宗旨)를 중심으로

최영진 1 ,
Young-Jin Choi 1 ,
Author Information & Copyright
1성균관대학교ㆍ교수
1Sungkyunkwan University
Corresponding Author : Young-Jin Choi

ⓒ Copyright 2009, The Daesoon Academy of Sciences. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Jun 26, 2009; Revised: Jul 22-29, 2009; Accepted: Aug 08, 2009

Published Online: Aug 25, 2009

Abstract

The Four Tenets of Daesoon thought are the Creative conjunction of the virtues of Eum and Yang, the Harmonious union of divine beings and human beings, the Resolution of grievances for the mutual beneficence of all life and the Realization of the Dao in the world.

This article compares the concepts of the “Creative conjunction of the virtues of Eum and Yang”, the “Harmonious union of divine beings and human beings” and the “Resolution of grievances for the mutual beneficence of all life” with “EumYangDaeDaeRon”, “ShinMyonKiDeok”, the Theory of Mutual Giving Life / Mutual Destruction (SangSaeng/SangGeukRon) of the Book of Changes and analyzes their common and different points. The conclusion is that Daesoon thought and the philosophy of the Book of Changes share common fundamental standpoints. However, the Daesoon thought defines the world of SeonCheon (the state before the Heaven and Earth have been created) as Mutual Giving Life (SangSaeng), and the world of HuCheon (the state after the Heaven and Earth have been created) as Mutual Destruction (SangGeuk). According to Daesoon thought the Mutual Destruction (SangGeuk) is seen as negative, while according to the philosophy of the Book of Changes the Theory of Mutual Giving Live/Mutual Destruction (SangSaeng/SangGeukRon) is viewed as a positive relationship of EumYangDaeDae. This is a point of difference between the Daesoon thought and the philosophy of the Book of Changes. According to EumYangDaeDae relationship theory the contradictory “other” is viewed not as an enemy, but as a necessary element that assures one’s existence.

When Buddhism and Christianity first came to existence, they did not belong to a main stream. Later, through continuous theorization and systematization they became generally accepted religions. The case of Confucianism was not much different. During Song dynasty in China Buddhism has contributed to the systematization and establishment of Neo-Confucianism; in the middle of 20th century the Confucian scholars of Hong Kong and Taiwan interpreted and defined Confucianism a new in the light of Western philosophy. Thus the “Modern Neo-Confucianism” came to existence. That’s why the history of Confucianism is also called “the history of advancing and developing a concept”.

From this point of view the critical acceptance of some elements of Confucian, Buddhist, Taoist etc. traditions, as well as modern philosophy, by Daesoon, in order to achieve the systematization of Daesoon thought, is a very important process. As a part of this process, this essay explains the Daesoon thought from the point of view of the Book of Changes, which may be said to present the original East-Asian view of the world. Daesoon’s emphasis of human dignity, the equality of sexes, the critics the hierarchical society etc. are rather “modern” and should be examined from the point of view of social science. Besides, leaving the boundaries of “modern philosophy”, the concepts of “Harmonious union of divine beings and human beings”, viewing the universe as one organism etc. should be approached from the point of view of Post-Modernism.

Keywords: philosophy of the Book of Changes; Daesoon thought; Eum-Yang; Mutual Giving Life; Mutual Destruction; divine beings; human beings

<참고문헌>

1.

『典經』

2.

『周易』

3.

『中庸』

4.

『周易本義』

5.

『周易折中』

6.

『梅月堂集』

7.

『花潭集』

8.

『中庸講義補』

9.

『說文解字』

10.

양무목, 『음양합덕의 현대적 의의』, 『대순진리학술논총』2집<음양합덕특집호>, 대진학술원, 2008.

11.

양무목, 『신인조화의 사상사적 의의』, 『대순진리학술논총』3집, 대순학술원, 2008.

12.

이천수, 『음양의 조화로 맞는 새 세상』, 『대순진리학술논총』2집<음양합덕특집호>, 대진학술원, 2008.

13.

정대진, 『신인조화의 이해』, 『대순진리학술논총』3집, 대순학술원, 2008.

14.

최영진, 『역학사상의 철학적 탐구 : 『주역』의 음양대대적 구조와 중정사상을 중심으로』, 성균관대 박사논문, 1989.

15.

유승국, 『한국역학사상의 특질과 그 문화적 영향』, 『주역과 한국역학』, 범양사출판부, 1996.

16.

박종홍, 『일반논리학』, 박영사, 1967.

17.

이광규, 『레비-스트로스』, 대한기독교서회, 1980.

18.

최영진, 『유교사상의 본질과 현재성』, 성균관대출판부, 2002.