Article

대순사상과 진여사상의 포덕과 교화에 관한 비교연구

김용환 1 ,
Yong-Hwan Kim 1 ,
Author Information & Copyright
1충북대학교ㆍ교수
1Chungbuk National University
Corresponding Author : Yong-Hwan Kim

ⓒ Copyright 2015, The Daesoon Academy of Sciences. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: May 31, 2015; Accepted: Oct 06, 2015

Published Online: Jun 01, 2017

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this article is to study on the comparative relationship between mutual cooperation of the Dae-soon thought of Dae-soon jinrihoe and Shinnyo thought of Shinjo Ito. Dae-soon thought focuses on outspreading virtues and enlightenment teaching based on the saying of Jeong-san Sang Jae’s Mutual cooperation without any grudge. According to the Buddha’s nature thought of Shinjo Ito, ‘Dharma kāya resident’ is the source of touching upon buddhahood. The Shinyo-en is an outward manifestation of their deep resolve to help others by cultivating spiritual faculty and mind session.

First, we can find the virtue action theory in the mutual cooperation of Dae-soon thought and the virtue nature theory in the Shinnyo thought of Shinjo Ito. From the perspective of comparative relationship, it was Jeong-san Sang Jae who laid foundation for the Posterior Grand Renewal. His idea is that the universe should be completed through the mutual communication between the earth and men following the Posterior Grand Renewal. It was Kyodoin-sama who laid the foundation for identifying the place Shinchoji was established. It was at the time that the power we call bakku-daiju as transversality and Shinnyo spiritual faculty were perfected through Shindoin-sama’s passing.

Second, based on Jeon-kyungn or Dae-soon Ji Chim, outspreading virtue is to awaken mutual cooperation without any grudge and the enlightenment teaching to practice according to mutual cooperation principle without any deceit toward one´s own self. No deceit toward one’s own self is to be sincere, to be respectful and to be faithful in Jeong-san Sang Jae. In the different context of Mahayana Buddhism, we can be aware that the immortal resident immortal of Dharma kāya is the source of permanent bliss in the Mahāyāna Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra’ From the perspective of comparative relationship to pray toward Jeong-san Sang Jae and to participate in the Posterior Grand Renewal is to take part in Cheonji-Gongsa. It is a similar phenomena to be reflected suchness reality before the three personifications of buddhahood and the Shinnyo Stupa is the same meaning as meeting the ever present Buddha. Both of them, they focus to find religious altruism from real possibilities of mutual support. They argue that to dispense with altruism is to dispense with Sang Jae or Dharma for the divine transformation of human possibilities

Third, Everybody possesses unique and wonderful abilities to be unified with Jeong-san Sang Jae. If we seek happiness by trying to get by without making much of an effort to take part in Cheonji- Gongsa, it will be difficult to attain the harmony and peace of mankind with outspreading virtues and enlightenment teaching. In the ‘Mahāyāna Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra’ tells us ‘all sentient beings have Buddha nature’ that could be the possibility to the fulfillment of buddhahood in the spiritual practice. From the comparative relationship, we can strive with open hearts and minds, in efforts that benefit others, and in ways we can work together to build a word of joy in which everyone can have an opportunity to cultivate spiritual faculty. This is based on mutually beneficial voluntary focused our principles into practice the spirit to build a mind session of Shinnyo as the civic clean precepts of ‘Mahāyāna Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra’. Fourth, the disciples of Jeong-san Sang Jae are encouraged to acquire the Mutual cooperation manner of being considerate. It is important to accumulate virtue action by daily effort. It is the contrast to awaken virtue nature by daily practice. The Buddha’s nature thought of Shinjo Ito is based on the thought of Mahāyāna Mahāparinirvāṇa Sūtra. It can be supported by the Shinnyo parents and the two Dojis to build a world of joy as the light dharma descending and the emphasis of Tathatā spiritual faculty. It’s not that we can’t do something we haven’t attained a higher spiritual level. What counts is our continuos effort, act so we can cultivate our spiritual faculty through the way of mind session.

Keywords: Jeong-san Sang Jae; Shinjo Ito, mutual cooperation; outspreading virtues; enlightenment teaching; cultivating spiritual faculty; mind session

참고문헌(References)

1.

대순진리회 교무부, 『전경』, 여주: 대순진리회 출판부, 2004.

2.

대순진리회 교무부, 『대순지침』, 서울: 대순진리회 출판부, 1984.

3.

대순진리회 교무부, 『대순진리회요람』, 서울: 대순진리회, 1969.

4.

『大正新脩大藏經』, 涅槃部, T.0374~T.0396.

5.

『열반경 ⅠㆍⅡ』, 이운허 옮김, 서울: 동국역경원, 2011.

6.

『한국불교전서』, 서울: 불교문화연구원, 1996.

7.

김용환, 「열반경의 열반과 이또 신조(伊藤眞乘) 불성사상의 상관연동 연구」, 『한국교수불자연합 학회지』 21(1), 2015.

8.

박승식, 「대순사상과 사회복지」, 『대순사상논총』 6, 1998.

9.

박종수, 「대순진리회의 사회복지사업 현황과 과제」, 『대순사상논총』 24(1), 2014.

10.

신종교연구회, 『신종교 가이드』, 동경: 구천사, 2006.

11.

이경원, 『한국 신종교와 대순사상』 서울: 도서출판 문사철, 2011.

12.

溝口敦, 『新宗敎時代 1』, 東京: 大蔵出版株式會社, 1996.

13.

眞如苑文書伝道部, 『解說眞如怨の敎學』, 東京: 大日本印刷株式會社, 2010.

14.

眞如苑敎學部, 『歡喜世界』, 東京: 大日本印刷株式會社, 2014.

15.

稱場圭信, 『利他主義と宗敎』, 東京: 弘文堂, 2012.

16.

伊藤眞乘, 『燈火念念』, 東京: 眞如苑敎學部, 2009.

17.

眞乘刊行會 編, 『眞乘』, 東京: 中央公論新社, 2012.

18.

大宮司朗, 『靈術傳授』, 東京: 中央精版印刷株式會社, 2012.

19.

ひろたみお, 『ルポル-タジュ眞如苑その時代性と革新性をさぐる』, 東京: 知人館株式會社, 1990.

20.

Arendt, H., The Origin of Totalitarianism, London: George Allen & Unwin, 1967.

21.

Cohen R. A., "Ethics and cybernetics: Levinas reflections", Ethics and Information Technology, Vol.2, 2000.

22.

Hans Küng(Ed.), A Global Ethic for Global Politics and Economics, London: SCM Press, 1997.

23.

Fred W. Clothey, Religion in India, New York: Routledge, 2006.

24.

MacKinnon Barbara, Ethics Theory and Contemporary Issues, New York: Wadsworth Publishing, 1995.

25.

Panikkar, Raimon, Pluralism and Oppression, New York: University Press of America, 1991.

26.

Panikkar, Raimon,Cultural Disarmament, Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 1995.

27.

Panikkar, Raimon,Intra-Religious Dialogue, New York: Paulist Press, 1999.

28.

Panikkar, Raimon,Mysticism and Spirituality, New York: Orbis Books. 2014.

29.

Ross, W. D., The Right and the Good, Oxford: Oxford Press, 1930.

30.

Shinnyo­en, Starting Out­An Introduction to Shinnyo Practice, Tokyo: International Affairs Department of Shinnyo­en, 2010.

31.

Shinnyo­en, Morning&Evening Chanting, Tokyo: International Affairs Department of Shinnyo­en, 2011.

32.

Tye, K.A., "Globalizing Global Education to Nurture World Citizens," Education Digest, Vol.69, No.4, 2003.

33.

White, P., Civic Virtues and Public Schooling: Educating Citizens for a Democratic Society, New York: Teachers College Press, 1996.