Article

한국불교에서 본 대순사상: 미륵사상과 삼교회통(조화)사상을 중심으로

이병욱 1 ,
Byung-Wook Lee 1 ,
Author Information & Copyright
1고려대학교ㆍ강사
1Korea University
Corresponding Author : Byung-Wook Lee

ⓒ Copyright 2015, The Daesoon Academy of Sciences. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: May 31, 2015; Accepted: Oct 06, 2015

Published Online: Jun 01, 2017

ABSTRACT

In this paper, I will study the common point between Korean buddhist thought and Daesoon thought. In 2 chapter, I will illuminate Kang Jeungsan to be familiar with buddhist culture. Daewonsa(大院寺) was the place Kang Jeungsan's to enlighten Path. Kang Jeungsan said Śākyamuni to the people to follow himself. And Kang Jeungsan burned Thousand-Hands Sutra(千手經) as one of Chenjigongsa(天地公事). In 3 chapter I study the unfolding of Korean Maitreya thought and the interpenetration of the three teachings. In 4 chapter I study the idea of Maitreya Buddha and the unity of the three teachings in Daesoon thought. Maitreya has the origin in India. Korea accepted this Maitreya via China. In Silla era, the people accepted Maitreya in relation to Hwarang(花郞). In Unified Silla era, Beopsang jong(法相宗) accepted Maitreya devotion positively and the typical person is Jinpyo(眞表). In Goryeo era, Beopsang jong devoted Maitreya, on the other hand Maitreya devotion changed the popular devotion. In Joseon era, Maitreya devotion changed the popular devotion more and more. In this background, Kang Jeungsan accepted the idea of Maitreya Buddha. And Kang Jeungsan insisted that he is the existence to give Heaven’s decree to Choe Jeu(崔濟愚) of Donghak and to combine Jesus of Christianity. The interpenetration of the three teachings is one of the stream of Joseon era’s buddhim. We can read this in Hamheo Deuktong(涵虛得通)’s Hyeonjeongron(顯正論) and Yuseokjiluiron (儒釋質疑論) to pretend Hamheo Deuktong and Cheongheo Hyujeong(淸虛休靜)’s Samgagwigam(三家龜鑑). This interpenetration of the three teachings of Joseon era influenced Daesoon thought. The unity of the three teachings in Daesoon thought is divided into three. The first is the unity of the three teachings of Gwanwang(冠旺)’s standpoint, the second is the unity of the three teachings of Sungyo(仙敎) superior standpoint, the third is the unity of the three teachings of Jinmuk(震黙)’s anecdote. The interpenetration of the three teachings of Joseon era is connected with the unity of the three teachings of Jinmuk’s anecdote. Thus Joseon era’s buddhist thought and Daesoon thought have the common point in the idea of Maitreya Buddha and the interpenetration(unity) of the three teachings.

Keywords: Daewonsa(大院寺); Thousand-Hands Sutra(千手經); the interpenetration of the three teachings; Beopsang jong (法相宗); Jinmuk(震黙)'s anecdote; the idea of Maitreya Buddha

참고문헌(References)

1.

『전경』, 여주: 대순진리회 출판부, 2010.

2.

『삼국사기』.

3.

『삼국유사』 (『한국불교전서』6권).

4.

『유석질의론』 (『한국불교전서』7권).

5.

『현정론』 (『한국불교전서』7권).

6.

김남희, 「증산교의 미륵신앙의 수용과 전개과정」, 『한국불교학』 61, 2011.

7.

김삼룡, 『한국미륵신앙의 연구』, 서울: 동화출판공사, 1983.

8.

김영호, 「깨달음의 보편성과 특수성-불교와 증산의 경우」, 『한국종교사연구』 10, 2002.

9.

김 탁, 「한국종교사에서의 불교와 증산교의 만남」, 『동양고전연구』 3, 1994.

10.

김홍철, 「증산교사상사」, 『한국종교사상사』, 서울: 연세대출판부, 1998.

11.

박인규,「한국불교진언과 대순진리회 주문의 비교연구」, 『대순사상논총』 22, 2014.

12.

불교문화연구원 편, 『한국미륵신앙연구』, 서울: 동국대출판부, 1987.

13.

윤기봉,「불교 권화사상의 한국적 전개와 대순사상연구」, 동국대학교 박사학위 논문, 1994.

14.

윤재근, 「증산사상의 불교수용과 해석」, 『신종교연구』 23, 2010.

15.

윤재근, 「증산의 유교비판과 수용」, 『종교교육학연구』 35, 2011.

16.

은정희, 「서산 휴정의 삼가귀감 정신」, 『동양철학』 3, 1992.

17.

이경원, 『한국 신종교와 대순사상』, 서울: 문사철, 2011.

18.

이경원, 『대순진리회 신앙론』, 서울: 문사철, 2012.

19.

이덕진, 「불교철학과 대순사상의 사상체계에 대한 일고찰」, 『대순사상논총』 20, 2009.

20.

장지훈, 『한국고대미륵신앙연구』, 서울: 집문당, 1997.

21.

정석종, 「조선후기 숙종연간의 미륵신앙과 사회운동」, 『한우근박사정년기념사학논총』, 서울: 지식산업사, 1981.

22.

한종만, 「조선조의 철학사상과 시대정신」, 『동양철학』 2, 1991.